Emcee hawaii11/7/2022 ![]() Note: all functions discussed here need to have the actual model defined in ISIS. In particular do not write the file in your home-directory! Analyzing the chain (see below) is comparable to a data reduction, i.e., the resulting probability distributions are much smaller in filesize. Emcee hawaii serial#Warning: the output FITS-file can be extremely large (several GB), depending on the number of free parameters, walkers, and iterations! So consider writing the file to the local hard-drive (in case of a serial run) or on a network drive, e.g., userdata. After having analyzed the chain (see below) one might consider to change these numbers. The above example should be sufficient to have a first glance. However, a good value for these numbers cannot be given in general. Note: the number of walkers, nw, can be much smaller than the number of iterations, nsim. Note: the allowed parameter ranges for the initial walker distribution is taken from the parameter ranges set in the model! To actually find the most probable parameters the resulting parameter chain has to be analyzed (see next Section). Also, the found best-fit is not set the chain has just been produced. The function does not have any return value. Serial % perform a calculation on a single core (see below) Output = "emcee-chain.fits", % output FITS-filename for the chain Instead of perform a fit using fit_counts we use the emcee method:ġ00, % number of walkers, nw, per free parameterġ000 % number of iterations, nsim, i.e., the number of "walker"-steps _A(hi), _A(lo), reverse(flux + grand(nbins)*err), reverse(err) This is a working minimal example with a simple power-law spectrum. Furthermore, determining parameter uncertainties in case of a bad fit-statistic is much more robust with emcee (see below). emcee still finds the most probable solution. Or in other words, even if it is not possible to achieve a reduced χ² near 1 with a model. But given your model assumptions, it will give yout the best answer." (by Mike Nowak). Whether it’s a good answer in an “absolute” sense is a different question. In the best case, there is only one strong peak, which corresponds to the best-fit.Īnother advantage of emcee is that " the MCMC basically is working off of changes in chi^2, not the absolute value. The histogram of chosen parameter values is then proportional the underlying probability distribution, i.e., peaks in the distribution correspond to possible solutions. The result is the so-called parameter chain, which is a list parameters in each iteration step. This is in contrast to the common χ²-minimization algorithms and, thus, further possible solutions within the parameter space can be found naturally. Since the choice of going back or move further is randomized as well and weighted with the fit-statistic, a worth parameter combination might get accepted.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |